بررسی تقابل دوگانۀ نمادها در اسطورۀ زروان لرستان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانش‌آموختۀ دکتری گروه زبان و ادبیات فارسی، دانشگاه لرستان، خرم‌آباد، ایران

2 دانش‌آموختۀ کارشناسی ارشد گروه باستان‌شناسی، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان، زاهدان، ایران

چکیده

ساختارگرایان به اصطلاح تقابل دوگانه توجه بسیاری نشان داده‌اند. تقابل دوگانه به این معنا است که تضاد و تقابلی در میان بسیاری از عناصر و پدیده‌ها وجود دارد؛ بنابراین، ذهن انسان برای شناخت پدیده‌ها به نشانه‌های متضاد متوسل می‌شود. این مفهوم در شناخت اساطیر و پدیده‌های رمزآلود و نمادین مؤثر است. آثار باستانی لرستان با محوریت زروان، به سبب منشأ رازآلود مذهبی‌شان، سرشار از نشانه‌ها و نمادهای تقابلی است. در این مقاله، با روش توصیفی‌تحلیلی کوشش شده است تقابل‌های دوگانه در نقش‌مایه‌هایی از زروان لرستان بررسی شوند. آیین زروانی بر دوگانه‌‌پرستی تکیه دارد؛ بنابراین، زروان هم مرد و هم زن است و این می‌‌تواند به انیما و انیموس اشاره داشته باشد. اهورامزدا همراه با نیروهایش در سمت راست زروان و اهریمن نیز با نیروهایش در سمت چپ زروان قرار گرفته‌اند. نمادهای اهورایی به‌صورت جوانان، گل و روباه و نمادهای اهریمنی به‌صورت پیران، نوزادان و مار کبری وجود دارد. بیشتر این تقابل‌ها در پیشبرد اهداف مذهبی به کار گرفته شده‌اند.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

A Study of the Binary Opposition of Symbols in Zurvan Myth of Lurestan

نویسندگان [English]

  • YosofAli Beiranvand 1
  • Mohammad Mirzai Rashnoo 2
1 Ph. D. Graduate of Persian Language and Literature, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran
2 M. A. Graduate of Archeology, Sistan and Baluchestan University, Zahedan, Iran
چکیده [English]

Abstract
The binary opposition is a term to which structuralists have paid much attention. It means that there is a contradiction among many elements and phenomena. The human mind resorts to the phenomena by means of antithetical signs. The binary oppositioncan be effective in recognizing mystical and symbolic phenomena and myths. Artworks can be represented by signs and symbols and what is related to culture. In the present study, the artworks of ancient Lurestan, which are related to the Iron Age, are examined with a descriptive-analytical method from the perspective of binary opposition. The authors divided the images of artworks into small units and examined the relationships between them. Zurvanism is based on dualism. Zurvan is one of the great gods of Lurestan and one of the gods of the Zoroastrian faith. Zurvan is both male and female at the same time which might refer to anima and animus. Zurvan procreated both Ahuramazda and Ahriman. Zurvan's face looks like a man, but her hair is like a woman in a bronze headpin. Ahuramazda and his forces are symbolically positioned at the right side of Zurvan, but the Devil and his forces are at his (Zurvan's) left side. Ahura's images are young, in the forms of flower and fox, but the images of Demon (the alternative name for the devil) are old, or rather too young (i.e. infants), at the same time, and in the form of a serpent. Most of such conflicts have been used for religious purposes.
Understanding the contrasts in a structure helps to understand its general meaning. Lévi Strauss believes that our ancestors have used binary opposition to better understand the world. Strauss first divides myths into smaller units , which he calls ‘myth im’. Then, he examines the metaphorical meaning of myth ims.
Zurvan is the god of time who has an eternal and dual nature. He has twin brothers, Ormazd and Ahriman, for the followers of the Zurvanism religion. Zurvan is the name of a minor god in Avesta. However, in the Pahlavi texts, which represent the tradition of the Sassanid period, he has a prominent character. He is eternal like Ormazd and Ahriman in some texts because the god of time has no beginning of time and he is the beginning of everything himself. Zurvanism religion is a common form of Zoroastrianism during the Sassanid era.
In the present study, two images attributed to ancient Lurestan were examined. In the first image, Zurvan has been depicted in the form of a man, with a majestic face, along with a beard on his upper body and the face of a beautiful woman on his chest. This image shows the confrontation between male and female types. To the right of Zurvan can be seen God bless (Ahuramazda), four standing young men, three sitting young men, and a flower. To the left of Zurvan are the Devil (Ahriman), four standing old men, and three infants on the ground. Ahuramazda’s forces can be Amshaspandan, who is seven persons, and the Devil’s forces can be Diwan, who is also seven persons; therefore, the forces of Ahuramazda and Ahriman are in opposition to each other.
The second image is a headpin obtained from Sorkhdome Lori of Koohdasht. Zurvan's face has both the facial features of a man and a woman at the same time. Zurvan's thick eyebrows and rough face are signs of masculinity and his crown-like hairs refer to his femininity. On the right side of Zurvan, there is a flower that looks like a lotus or sunflower, which is a symbol of Ahuramazda. An animal has been engraved in this part of the image which looks like a fox or a jackal. This animal has worn clothes and a branch in its hand. In other countries, the symbols of the fox are interesting and associated with positive gods. In other countries, the symbols of the fox are and associated with positive gods. On the left side of Zurvan, the Devil is depicted as a hunchbacked infant. There is also a cobra snake which can be from the forces of the Devil on this side of Zurvan. This snake has hands and legs. It seems that it has had sacredness before the religion of Zoroaster and the Abrahamic religions. Snake is included as one of the Devil's creatures in Bundahishn’s book. The clothes are all over the top and cover them up to the toes. Only Zurvan has a belt on his waist, which is on his right side to the left, and this can be a sign of Ahuramazda's superiority over the Devil. The Zurvan in the middle of the page is the unifier of the world of light and darkness or the world of good and evil. The shape of the plate is a circle. As Jung puts it, the circle has been a symbol of both the male and female sexes at the same time. The height of Zurvan is so tall that covers the entire screen. It seems that his head is in the sky and his feet are on the earth. On this basis, Zurvan alone contains the sky and earth. The hairs of Zurvan are like a mountain. The mountain is also a symbol of the goddesses.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Structuralism
  • Symbol
  • Binary Opposition
  • Zurvan
  • Lurestan
References
- Akbari Mafakher, A. (2009). Worship of Ahriman in Zurvanism and Surviving Examples of It. Journal of Iranian Studies, 8(16), 89- 111.
- Alizadeh, S. (2017). A Study of the Relationship Between Patterns and Their Application in Lorestan Bronze Headpins. Journal of the Letter of Visual and Applied Arts, 19, 109-125.
- Amouzegar, Zh. (2008). Mythological History of Iran. Tenth Edition. Tehran: Samt Publication.
- Bahar, M. (2007). Asian Religions. Sixth Edition. Tehran: Cheshmeh Publication.
- Bahar, M. (2014). A Research in Iranian Mythologies. Tenth Edition. Tehran: Toos Publication.
- Benonist, E. (2007). The Persian Religion, According to the Chief Greek Texts. Translated by Bahman Sarkarati. Third Edition. Tehran: Qatreh Publication.
- Bertens, H. (2005). Literary Theory: The Basics Paperback. Translated by Mohammad Reza Abolghasemi. First Edition. Tehran: Mahi Publication.
- Campbell, J. (1988). The Power of Myth. Translated by Abbas Mokhber. First Edition. Tehran: Center Publication.
- Chevalier, J. (2005). Dictionnaire Des Symboles. Translated by Soudabeh Fazaeli. Second Edition. Tehran: Jeyhun Publication.
- Christensen, A. (2009). Mazdaism in Ancient Iran. Translated by Zabihollah Safa. Sixth Edition. Tehran: Helmand Publication.
- Cooper, G. C. (2000). Illustrated Culture of Traditional Symbols. Translated by Maliheh Karbasian. First Edition. Tehran: Farshad Publication.
- Cuddon, J. A. (1999). A Dictionary of Literary Terms. Fourth Edition. London: Pinguin Books.
- Culican, W. (2006). Archeology and History of Art in the Mad and Persian Periods. Translated by Goudarz As'ad Bakhtiar. Second Edition. Tehran: Pazineh Publication.
- Dadgi, F. (2016). The Beginning of Creation. Translated by Mehrdad Bahar. Fifth Edition. Tehran: Toos Publication.
- Eliade, M. (2015). A History of Religious Ideas. Translated by Jalal Sattari. Fifth Edition. Tehran: Soroush Publication.
- Fourie, P. J. (2007). Media Studies. Second Edition. Cape Town: Jata & Co. Ltd.
- Gignoux, Ph. (2016). Man and Cosmos in Ancient Iran. Translated by Linda Goodarzi. Second Edition. Tehran: Mahi Publication.
- Girshman, R. (2011). Perse. Proto-Iraniens, Mèdes, Achéménides. Translated by Issa Behnam. Third Edition.  Tehran: Elmi va Farhangi Publication.
- Guerin, W. L., Labor, E. G., & Wilingham, J. (1978). A Handbook of Critical Approaches to Literature. Translated by Farzane Taheri. Second Edition. Tehran: Niloofar Publication.
- Hall, J. (2001). Dictionary of Symbols in East and West Art. Translated by Roghayeh Behzadi. First Edition. Tehran: Contemporary Culture Publication.
- Hezhabari Nobari, A., & Sabzi Doabi, M. (2011). Lorestan Bar Pins. The Journal of Historical Sociology. 3(2), 165- 188.
- Hinnells, J. (2007). Understanding Iranian Mythology. Translated by Zhale Amouzegar and Ahmad Tafazoli. Twelfth Edition. Tehran: Cheshmeh Publication.
- Jung, K. G. (1990). Psychologie et Religion. Translated by Foād Rouhani. Seventh Edition. Tehran: Elmi- Farhangi Publiction.
- Jung, K. G. (1991). Memories, Dreams, and Reflections. Translated by Parvin Faramarzi. First Edition. Mashhad: Astan e Ghods e Razavi.
- Jung, K. G. (1997). The Human and His Symbols. Translated by Mahmoud Soltaniye. Ninth Edition. Tehran: Jami Publication.
- Kaviani Pouya, H., & Pilevarian, Z. (2016). A Study of Zurvan's Philosophy in Religious Thoughts Based on Pahlavi Letters. Journal of Iranian Studies, 15(30), 133- 153.
- Khosravi, Y. (2004). Immortality in Ancient Iran. Book of the Art Month, 75, 84-97.
- Levi-Strauss, C. (1974). Anthropology Structural. Vol II. New York: Pinguins Books Publishing.
- Majidzadeh, Y. (1988). History of Lorestan Bronze Headpinds. The Journal of Archeology and History, 3(1), 3-15.
- Mohassel, R.(1987). Gozideha-ye Zadesparam.  First Edition. Tehran: The Institute of Cultural Studies and Research.
- Mole, M. (2016). Culte, Myth et Cosmologie Dans l'Iran Ancient. Translated by Mohammad Mirzaei. First Edition.  Tehran: Contemporary View Publishing.
- Negahban, E. (1996). A Review of Fifty Years of the Archaeology of Iran. First Edition. Tehran: The Organization of Cultural Heritage.
- Nyberg, H. S. (1994). Religions of Ancient Iran. Translated by Seifuddin Najmabadi. First Edition. Kerman: Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman.
- Okhovat, A. (2013). Grammar of the Story. Third Edition. Isfahan: Farda Publication.

- Samuelian, T. J. (2011). Refutation of the Sects: A Retelling of Yeznik Koghbatsi’s Apology. First Edition.  The USA: The University of Michigan, St. Vartan Press.

- Schmidt, E. F., Van Loon, M. N., & Curvers, H. H. (1989). The Holmes Expeditions to Lurestan. Chicago: Text, Oriental Institute Publication.
- Shamisa, S. (1391). Literary Criticism. Tehran: Mitra Publication.
- Shayganfar, H. R. (2005). Literary Criticism. Third Edition. Tehran: Dastan Publication.
- The Encyclopaedia of the Iranian Architectural History and of Iranshahr Architecture. (2020). The Temple of Sorkh Dome Lori. Retrieved from: http://iranshahrpedia.com/view/32339.
- Vakili, Sh. (2012). On Time, Huge Zurvan. First Edition. Tehran: Shoorafarin Publication.
- Vandenberge, L. (2000). The Archeology of Ancient Iran. Translated by Issa Behnam. Second Edition. Tehran: University of Tehran Press.
- Vieux, J. (1995). The Myths of Egypt. Translated by Abolghasem Ismailpour. First Edition. Tehran: Caravan Publication.
-Yektafar, M. (2011). The Masterpieces of Bronze of Lurestan. Journal of Visual Arts. 12, 14-18.
– Zaehner, R. Ch. (2005). Zurvan, a Zoroastrian Dilemma. Translated by Timur Ghaderi. First Edition. Tehran: Amir Kabir Publication.
- Zikrgou, A. H. (1998). Secrets of Indian Mythology. First Edition. Tehran: Fekre Rooz Publication.