<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Isfahan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Comparative Theology</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2008-9651</Issn>
				<Volume>2</Volume>
				<Issue>6</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2011</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Rational Interpretation of Religion From the Perspective of Tabatabai and Ghazali</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Rational Interpretation of Religion From the Perspective of Tabatabai and Ghazali</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>1</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>18</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">15698</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>S. Morteza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Hoseini Shahroodi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Professor, Department of  Philosophy &amp; Wisdom, Ferdowsi University of  Mashhad</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Taktom</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mashhadi</LastName>
<Affiliation>M.A Student in Islamic Philosophy, Ferdowsi University of  Mashhad</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>14</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Tabatabai’s theory regarding the interpretation is based on the Quran. In his view the interpretation is not of concept type but is of objective affairs. His purpose of objectivity is not personage objectivity but his purpose is out of mind. He believes that all the verses of Quran has interpretation. In Ghazali’s view interpretation has two aspects, one relates to fundamental meaning and another relates to dream interpretation. The role in the balance in his view is very prominent to explaining the Interpretation. In his view the Interpretation at first relates to concept types and secondly relates to personage.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Tabatabai’s theory regarding the interpretation is based on the Quran. In his view the interpretation is not of concept type but is of objective affairs. His purpose of objectivity is not personage objectivity but his purpose is out of mind. He believes that all the verses of Quran has interpretation. In Ghazali’s view interpretation has two aspects, one relates to fundamental meaning and another relates to dream interpretation. The role in the balance in his view is very prominent to explaining the Interpretation. In his view the Interpretation at first relates to concept types and secondly relates to personage.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Intellect</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">religion</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Ghazali</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Tabatabai</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Interpretation</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://coth.ui.ac.ir/article_15698_b942be8164276873414c62c6ffc02c6b.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
